CJH Knowledge Hub

Cleaning Claims at the End of a Tenancy

Cleaning is a common source of deposit disagreement. The central comparison is usually the standard at the start of the tenancy against the standard at the end, considered with the tenancy agreement.

Clean modern kitchen with white cabinets and stainless-steel appliances

Cleaning claims at the end of a tenancy

Cleaning is one of the most common areas of disagreement at check-out. The question is not whether the landlord would prefer a professional cleaning company or whether the tenant can produce a receipt. It is whether the property was returned to the cleanliness standard evidenced at the start of the tenancy, allowing for the agreement's lawful obligations, and whether any claimed remedy and cost are reasonable.

The starting standard is decisive

If a check-in inventory describes the oven as grease-free, extractor filters clean and bathroom tiles free of limescale, photographs and the check-out report can show whether these areas deteriorated. Conversely, if the inventory records a stained carpet and dusty skirting boards at check-in, the landlord cannot normally require the tenant to fund an improvement to a spotless standard. The check-in report should identify individual rooms, fittings and surfaces, rather than simply state 'professionally cleaned' without evidence.

A tenant may clean personally or use a contractor. What matters is the result, not the method. The Tenant Fees Act 2019 restricts mandatory third-party service charges. A clause requiring payment for a professional cleaner is not a substitute for proving the tenant left the property less clean than required. DPS guidance expressly distinguishes the cleaning standard from who carried out the work.

Distinguish cleaning, damage and wear

Cleaning: grease, food residue, removable dirt, excessive dust, limescale or removable carpet staining may justify a reasonable cleaning claim if the original condition was better. Damage: a burn, torn fabric or broken tile may require repair or a proportionate damage claim rather than a cleaning fee. Wear and tear: normal fading, flattening or age-related deterioration is not cured by cleaning and should not be charged as cleaning. Mould needs particular care: identify possible condensation, leaks, ventilation and repair obligations before attributing responsibility; a photograph of mould alone does not prove a tenant-caused breach.

What evidence should accompany a cleaning claim?

Provide the signed or properly delivered check-in report, dated entry photographs, the tenant's permitted comments, a comparable check-out report with dated images, the tenancy agreement, and a room-by-room schedule of work. For example, 'oven: thick grease to interior door and racks, previously recorded clean' is stronger than 'kitchen dirty'. Support the amount with a proportionate quote, itemised invoice or realistic estimate. Do not charge the tenant for routine preparation between tenancies or for cleaning unrelated areas that were already dirty.

Reasonable costs and avoiding betterment

The claim should be restricted to cleaning needed to restore the evidenced starting standard, not a complete property deep clean when only two areas need attention. If the landlord commissions a whole-property clean, distinguish the tenant-related elements from the landlord's own maintenance or marketing preferences. An invoice alone cannot prove that the full amount is recoverable. Consider whether an isolated task would have been reasonable, whether costs reflect local rates and whether work was actually needed.

Example: an oven cleaning claim

At check-in, the oven is recorded as clean, with photographs. At check-out, the oven has heavy baked-on grease; other rooms remain at their original standard. A reasonable, evidenced oven-cleaning charge may be supportable. Claiming for a full £300 deep clean solely because the landlord booked that service would be difficult to justify without separate evidence for the rest of the property.

Another example: a carpet was already marked at check-in and remains similarly marked at check-out. A charge to restore it to 'as new' condition would risk betterment. If new, distinct removable staining is evidenced, a targeted cleaning contribution may be considered.

Deposit disputes and October 2026 rules

A landlord proposing to retain money must explain and evidence the loss. The tenant can respond with check-in comments, photographs, cleaning evidence and correspondence. Try to resolve the dispute and release undisputed funds according to the scheme process. Where parties cannot agree, the approved deposit scheme may adjudicate; decisions are evidence-led, not automatic awards for invoices. In England, assured periodic tenancies replaced assured shorthold tenancies on 1 May 2026; applicable deposits remain subject to statutory protection and prescribed-information requirements. Do not treat the new tenancy regime as permission to impose prohibited cleaning fees.

Frequently asked questions

Must a tenant pay for a professional clean? Not merely because a landlord wants one. The relevant issue is the evidenced cleanliness standard and a lawful, reasonable remedy for any shortfall.

Does a cleaner's receipt prove the tenant left the property clean? It helps show what work was commissioned, but the resulting condition and check-out evidence still matter.

Can the landlord charge for the whole house because the oven is dirty? A whole-house claim needs evidence of a whole-house shortfall; itemise and limit costs to what is justified.

Who pays if mould is caused by a leak? Liability depends on the facts and repair duties. Do not assume tenant fault without investigating the source.

Can an inventory clerk decide who owes the cleaning bill? No. The clerk records condition and differences; the parties, scheme or court resolve liability.

Sources and further reading

  • GOV.UK, Tenant Fees Act guidance (updated July 2026): https://www.gov.uk/guidance/fees-you-can-charge-as-part-of-a-tenancy
  • GOV.UK, tenancy deposit protection: https://www.gov.uk/tenancy-deposit-protection
  • DPS, September 2026 adjudicator Q&A on cleaning standards and professional-clean clauses: https://www.depositprotection.com/news-insights/be-the-adjudicator-live-sept-26
  • DPS, burden of proof: https://www.depositprotection.com/learning-centre/disputes/common-dispute-questions
  • Mydeposits, deposit dispute process and cleaning scenarios: https://www.mydeposits.co.uk/content-hub/deposit-dispute-process/
  • TDS, guide to deposits, disputes and damages: https://www.tenancydepositscheme.com/resources/files/A%20guide%20to%20deposits%20disputes%20and%20damages.pdf

Please note: Information, not legal advice; evidence and scheme decisions depend on the individual tenancy. Check the current source guidance for your circumstances.

Important information

General information only; not legal advice.

Return to Knowledge Hub

Share this guide

Email link